- The Second Berlusconi government will go down in history for Italy have reversed the burden of proof with the support of the courts of Cassation and the Inland Revenue. Yes, that could not
- Mussolini and the sessantottino
was able to Berlusca! For about a week passed a law that makes it pretty useless tax investigations of the Guardia di Finanza: The financiers and the GIP will accuse you of tax evasion without having the burden of finding evidence for their accusation
So automatically, since the only evidence that can be produced are the bills and pay slips, if you deem insufficient, you will be convicted, right or wrong. For investigators reduces the workload, the Treasury will collect that extra money was not for it and all the pieces from 90 who can afford it, will make you free.
Without the principle, it applies to everything, and happily so Minister Paolo Romani it comes out a proposal by its Codacons Left and Center: charge the fee on the electricity bill RAI. To pay not need to prove that you do not see the TV. At this point no longer suffice to say you do not have the antenna and, above all, the state will resolve the long standing problem inherent in the concept of RAI Fee: "What the hell is" ?
For the uninitiated the Canon is a cross between a tax and a tax obscene, sold by subscription: in theory have to pay the holders of all those instruments or adapted to receive the national radio and television signal. Too bad that this includes any appliance with a screen at least 16 colors (including phones and videophones ) and any tool that receives radio waves (in theory
well as walkie-tokie Fisher-Price to your little son ...
) . Result? except in rare cases, if you have a home you will receive the newsletter at home, assuming you have one of these tools. To not pay you have to do something more worthy of a joke: you need to drive to seal the devices in question. What does this mean? You have to take a box and locked in: RAI then call inspectors who will stamp the tape you used to pack radio, TV and computer.
But it becomes a mess, mainly because Rai forces employee to move her butt : this problem in Italy is going on a rampage trade unionists, and mobilizes them. Just to let a couple of examples of the extent of the problem know that the FS employees who have more service engineers or inspectors and the Municipality of Rome has more policemen on the roads in the offices that control the traffic (
because length of service: that is, give to each of a Sad Sack desk after 3 years of traffic direction ... even if someone is not known thanks saw this gleam in their practice ...
). Long live Italy! So the Romans decided to solve the problem of controls reversing the burden of proof: all those who have an electricity contract also use it to power to an instrument or adapted to receive the TV signal and therefore must pay the fee. If you do not see the TV it must demonstrate to them how it is not known and therefore can not prove it and will have to pay the TV even if they do not.
The curious thing is usual for companies: those of '
ADUC,
months ago proposed to pay fees to companies that owned a PC. Now it goes without saying that if you're a hardware store, that PC you use for bills and inventory, not to see the TV. Also goes without saying that the fee for the companies already there and it costs twice that for families. Result? The hardware in the home, family-run, pay three charges: two in the company for a service that receives and one at home. ADUC But this has evaluated? Of course not, then those who have a VAT is a tax evader until he proves otherwise ...
escaped the danger (
the food in the house of Vincenzo Donvito refused to sell the cookies, thinking about the PC inventory? Or a restaurant once he realized that the bill does this automatically a handheld computer connected to the waiter?
) comes this new bullshit, obviously, Romans, known multimedia -phobic makes it his. The new proposal is interesting, if you have a VAT, because it forces you to pay twice: once for the House bill and the bill once and for shop or office. We also add that the bussiness electric bills have a higher cost than home and play is done.
But because a company has to pay, not just a service that actually does not, but actually pay more?
Some recent Supreme Court rulings have addressed in an interpretation a bit 'odd' s art. 53 of the Constitution. The article reads: Everyone shall contribute to public expenditure because of their ability to pay. The tax system is based on criteria of progressivity.
In theory here says everything and nothing:
which means ability to pay? Income tax. But what sets the amount of that tax? A self certification that sums up what
grossed working
we headed to the properties, net of those expenses can be deducted from the amount of grant that each year we receive directly or indirectly. And here the ass falls contradiction with the principle of ' art. 3
always
the Constitution
:
All citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law, without distinction of sex, race, language, religion, political opinion, conditions personal and social.
is the duty of the Republic to remove obstacles to economic and social nature which constrain the freedom and equality of citizens, prevent the full development of the human person and the effective participation of all workers in the political, economic and social development of the country.Why? Because if I have a paycheck deducted upstream the pennies, but if I have a VAT invoices are to myself and then I scrub all while declaring zero built one hundred thousand. Add the Italians from about 2000 years killing each other for a flat in Cecil in most of the diner, and behold, half the population is uncertain because the other half escapes taxation and the other half wonders why the first half receives a salary ...
The point is that the contradiction in theory dies at birth, because Article. 3 of the Constitution consists of two parts and the second says that the state must control
.
Where is the anomaly?
The State does not control a damn about anything and as you try to reduce them even more, 'sti controls, we come to think of the burden of proof, because this reduces the workload of the investigators and s'incassano money. If the pile is wrong
(
taking into account that the State and the investigators in question when they are wrong not apologize even if you ruin your life ...) not matter,
I °) because the new principle states that if you open suffered VAT, it means that you avoid paying taxes,II) recovered because avoidance is of primary importance in respect to any errors in the attribution of blame,
III) since the 90s and everyone knows that if accuse you're guilty.And then the state has discovered that his investigators so good to embed the alleged tax evaders are not
and occasionally some are also in bad shape: a case in point is the Ornella Muti that one fine day he decided to become citizens of Monaco and the Italian Treasury it did not go down and decided to ask
2 million of € toto. Here, after a few years, Muti has won Supreme with a ruling that says the Treasury has not submitted evidence and the fact that they were puppets of the actress in Italy in '97 does not mean anything.
And yes, because a major problem in Italy is a beautiful thought that the PM is not particularly probative and "could not know" if it is vaguely suffrage from something is just a beautiful phrase. So if
Valentino Rossi goes down his pants and Ornella Muti holds out, the Treasury, with whom retry him tough: no, Bossi, but the National Rocco ... pardon, Hungarian! Yes, because Rocco Siffredi has run for years moved with his beautiful mugliera to make porn movies in Hungary
where staff costs less (well? What do you want? In China, the girls are not as shapely Magyar ... and what the hell, not Siffredi assembles cars!
) and the tax burden is not paradise, but simply normal.Mr. Siffredi was found in front of the most typical problems: his city of birth in Italy, Ortona, took four years to record a change in residence and now the Treasury asked two million euro ( those who did not recover to Muti .. . ). We think the worst? Pensiamolo: The Treasury must plug a hole of € 2 million and does not know where to get them. Before anyone who discovers them subscribers, try a media coup. In this story, worthy of a French noir of the thirties, there is no peak response: If all pay taxes in Italy, actually lowered the rates? Let skepticism on: Germany has planned to collect 11 billion euro in 2011, Italy made a 11.1 billion during that same year, a hundred million more of our Teutonic neighbors. condomionio In Germany 70 million live Boche, Italy Campania in the building just over 55 million sciusciĆ ... The Germans that have both a civil servant per 30 Christians (Protestants), we Italians have a civil servant for every 10 Christians (Catholic) ...
Not always do the usual comparison of nearby grass (them if they smoke in freedom, we less ...), but it admitted that maybe they ( that still do not think they have tax evasion
) money spend it better than us ...
Maybe if the Italian began to make us live better, we would be more inclined to pay pensions to baby parliamentary ... I apologize ... taxes ... The site is located
Report this quick thinking of Gabanelli , it says that a hundred and a hundred it is silent, but still remains one of the few voices that something is leaked, with ups and downs: the juice emerging from the application of GABA is "and if we spent more public money?
The point is all there, in my opinion: if instead of running after the baby-sitter of VIP or municipal employees can pursue the reporting practices of change of residence within a reasonable timeframe, and if the Inland Revenue were all companies, large and small, in the same way, maybe, just maybe, you recover a bit 'more than skimpy 20-25 % of annual tax evasion. Yes, because although the bartender downstairs to receive the visits of GdF, the traffic wardens and ASL three or four times a year
is fined and maybe because it has exposed a cartel with the provisional timetable for the period, because there is nothing else to
fastened her ...), we find ourselves in front of June to celebrate the news of the recovery of about 50-60 billion € of tax avoidance: a pity that annuallymancherebero call 200-220 billion well and we wonder, given that the flying and running all the time that there is no dealer who has not heard from GERIT ask for money, who is so copious that avoid paying taxes .. . maybe ( and is an idea, eh ... ) who handles the money it regularly every day? Why, I do not know if you noticed, but all commercial activities, banking is often less controlled, since everything is in the hands of bodies whose members all belong to the same control environment and frequently refer to management meets ... a bit 'as if to check the records of the bartender was a committee Bar owners or accountants who work only for bartenders. But that's another story ...
DIY centers