Gasoline: a game for the massacre pump prices 
The
news this morning taken from the site fresh fresh
de La Repubblica that the gas is has increased even touching
1.5 euro per liter, 10 euro will buy just 6.5 liters of gasoline, or less than the reserve of fuel for many cars on the road.
If you bought a car thinking consumption, say you have a car that "drinks" about 6 / 6, 5 liters of fuel per 100 km on a mixed route (
Urban / Extra Urban ), then the accounts are made soon, according to the number of miles per day that ground, you'll know how much money you will spend more to move from house to car.
If you use a car or truck registered as promiscuous, and therefore a company car, are bitter pain, because at
guess you have taken more than a liter of gasoline for each 10 € spent fuel and if you make more than 100 km a day, you'll need enough cash to cover fixed costs increased by at least 10-15% monthly
. Same thing for the Diesel
(
environmental tax excluded) for the GPL
do not know, for '
electricity, we'll talk when we see used to circulate in the streets for your feet
, wash, calzateli of good walking shoes and ... safer and cheaper.
The question arises: "Why ?"... Why?
There is also a rhetorical question: "Cui prodest ?"... Who benefits from this?
Let's be clear, we should not make fools: the
oil drops. So it is not "the fault of the Arabs" if we increase the cost of fuel. But how the heck is calculated
then the cost of this product?
I found the answer on a blog (
the face of those who complain that such services take work away from national newspapers, which are evidently not able to provide quality information and useful data, but only opinions and are valid as those of anyone else):
on things that do not go there a nice post titled
The composition of the absurd price of gasoline . We report what they write:
- product cost and profit margin ( 31.33% on the total price ) ;
- Excise ( ie all taxes which the product is taxed whether they are local, regional or state - voice accounts for 52.00% )
- Value Added Tax, VAT, equal to 20% ( item weighs, of course, 20% compared to the sum of the first two and, therefore, for 16.67% of the total paid ) .
So
€ 1.50 on the State, or rather the Treasury and its supply chain (
this definition must be well understood by all : around alal collection of fees, taxes and their recovery, and the money issues arising from them, an entire wheel also led private ) drawn from the pockets of Italian citizens
€ 1.03 per liter for VAT and excise duties. As you can read in the post mentioned, the excise duty includes the financing of stuff like the war in Abyssinia
el '
flood in Florence: guess money does not end up to pay damages to restore it to the Florentine works of art that, where possible, are already been recovered in the '70s and '80s, they end up in Eritrea and the Ethiopian government to compensate people become old, very old or long dead, or their heirs. So the question of
Things that should not be is correct:
where they end up this money? The answer I gave is that
end up in one of the many unnecessary of funds into state coffers, which nobody has access
and begin to suspect that serve only as a guarantee
for other things.
You see, there is a law which provides that if destiny public money for the war in Abyssinia, then you can use them only for that and nothing else. There
a system for recovery of funds not used: we are so much accustomed to this way of managing public money, when in the 90 European Union began to provide funds to prop up the depressed areas, almost no one in Italy was able to and get them to join the Euro by the Prodi government as we were squeezed lemons worsening our situation instead of improving, yet many were convinced that the money, as had been earmarked for items sent to our country, would remain available even after.
Where do you think that the EU has put those funds to Italy and then not allocated? in a fund waiting for someone who asks for them? No, countries have used them for the second round of inputs (
Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Slovenia, etc.. ), to the dismay of all those who truly believed that "The whole world is country."
If there was no way in the past or today, access to these absurd provisions for events that occurred even before the birth of the Republic, we find that the sum recovered
probably be able to reschedule the public budgets . Instead
remain there, in the shadows: it is obvious that something should serve and then
I wonder if they are not used as collateral against Banks, Italian and foreign, to show that, if you wish, we are solvent and not a state of starved to the brink of bankruptcy: a "gold reserve" in cash instead of bullion.
around our cars, in addition to the dirt because they do not wash them, there is also a matter of considerable money based on false
pollution I say
pretend to fight because they are generally statutory auditors, which, among other things, should also be the greatest directors of the municipal transport company, such as'
ATAC in Rome, these unions are asking people to pay attention to the pollution emitted by their engines and remedied by putting private their wallets, but they do provide public transport which is
ecological at least questionable if not nonexistent. A veterinary
this thing comes out of the exhaust systems of buses and bus outside the city? I were to tell which are catalytic ... The Mayor of Rome
Alemanno wants to prevent the entry into the city to all the cars are not at least Euro 4
: the pantomime of particulate filters continues. Also at The Republic
is the comparison table that explains c he kinda difference between a class and the other, a minimum difference between the last three European directives, but involving the request by the State of
buy cars with every new absurdity. To try to run behind a nation where the top public, there is all people who have no money problems, we should pay rate
life changing car every 5 years . Yet it is clear now, especially with the new directive
Euro 6 will enter into force in 2015, which
has reached the technical limit or beyond which current technologies are unlikely to bring down the emission of dust and pollutants .
And then you invent to collect money from registrations? A little 'as the blue sticker famiggerato
(
is starting to change color, green, wrapped in orange, etc.. ): have you ever wondered what the hell is it for?
When you bring the '
car do the review or cutting,
will also control the exhaust gas and
use the same machine for testing of the blue sticker.
In theory are two different tests: the review and that of the adhesive sticker and it costs you a figure that hovers around 20 €
every year just the excuse that it is a question other than that made with review. But, in fact,
the test that is done is only a , because unlike employees who handle this stupid sticker,
The mechanic doing the test has no time to lose and does not take for
bottoms by just doing the same test twice with the same equipment to certify the same thing twice ...
Score: road tax the state collects each year, collects VAT on the review; collects the blue label of € 20, grossed more than € 1 for every gallon of gasoline we buy, collects VAT on purchases motor vehicle, dealer fees, taxes from the car manufacturer, to the gas station, the producer of gasoline, the mechanic ... collects a lot of money.
Then there because the state increases the cost of gasoline? Or are the companies the industry who would like a higher profit margin to 31.33% (gross
)?
Gross? Yes, gross.
The remaining 47 cents if you divide the companies that make up the entire chain , but above the year-end we are paying taxes regularly, and raggionando on rates, the actual net is about half, 23 cents, to be divided between the cost of raw materials, refining, transportation, wholesale and retail. Have you
accounts and see the gas station that is left of your € 1.5 ... We live to move a machine whose sole purpose is to move money in this maxim is perhaps hidden the truth of who holds the reins of this country, as evidenced by more and more statistics and private research in Italy and abroad. While all information
focuses on 'Orco
Berlusconi (
but after more than 700 notices of investigation and never even a sentence, it always leaves to think that either is truly divine and we have some of the investigators' DUMB , who waste time on theories and theorems and to seek real hard evidence ... ), I wonder what I will create more damage:
a prime minister convicted of sexual offenses (
Belgium is still there after Half of its leaders, VIP, clergy and professionals were sentenced for having sex, and even worse, with a diciassettene, but children under ten years and a newborn ... ) or
langue and a wallet that a debt collector who does not want to listen to reason? I'll be bad and also cynical, but I know that even if Berlusconi goes away and another comes up, the situation will not improve at all: many of the ills of Italy are the ridiculous ideas
sessantottino: the school promotes all, the right to have a fixed salary even if you do not have requirements or the ability to maintain a job, the right to keep their jobs even when it is absent or unable to cause such damage only; the pathetic habit of taking in the public sector unemployed even if they have already saturated all the available places, but to balance the statistics, the mad craze to take the low 'inflation
to the point of having power to prevent the mass purchase, but at the same time denying that we live in a nation with a
inrecuperabile deflation.
So yes, the professor of
The best goventù right:
the only thing you touch the bottom as soon as possible , why then is a good reconstruction, and perhaps some hope, although the EU has a clear message Data Type:
Greece. They can be traced denied: they must remain poor, poor, provided the Bankers of Europe can remain rich, rich.
The real enemy is not Berlusconi, but Trichet
...
